01 / 10
Every user type — Administrator, Management, Quality Team, Team Lead, Engineer, Vendor — signs into the same platform, but sees only the modules mapped to their role in the permission matrix.
Management lands here after login — operational load, vendor performance and compliance health in one view, replacing the spreadsheet-and-email status chase described in Section 3.1.
| Vendor | Category | Score | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision Cast Components | Tier 1 | 4.6 | ▲ up |
| Anand Fabricators | Tier 1 | 4.3 | — flat |
| Shreeji Engineering Works | Tier 2 | 3.4 | ▼ down |
| Bharat Heat Treaters | Tier 2 | 3.9 | ▲ up |
| Time | Event | Reference | Actor |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10:42 | NCR raised — surface porosity | NCR-2026-0143 | S. Naik (Engineer) |
| 10:15 | Inspection report submitted | TCK-2026-0881 | A. Rane (Engineer) |
| 09:58 | Ticket escalated — SLA breach risk | TCK-2026-0874 | System |
| 09:30 | Vendor assessment approved | VA-2026-0022 | P. Deshmukh (Quality) |
A single, centralized vendor record — profile, documents, inspection history, NCR history and assessment history — replacing scattered vendor files across email and spreadsheets.
| Vendor | Category | Location | Open Tickets | NCRs (YTD) | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision Cast Components VEND-0012 | Casting | Pune | 2 | 0 | 4.6 | |
| Anand Fabricators VEND-0031 | Fabrication | Aurangabad | 4 | 1 | 4.3 | |
| Shreeji Engineering Works VEND-0047 | Machining | Nashik | 6 | 3 | 3.4 | |
| Bharat Heat Treaters VEND-0058 | Heat Treatment | Chakan | 1 | 0 | 3.9 |
Every inspection request moves through one governed lifecycle: Open → Assigned → In Progress → Under Review → Completed → Closed. Nothing sits in an inbox unaccounted for.
Team leads balance engineer workload, watch SLA timers and reassign calls before they escalate — visibility that today lives only in one person's head.
| Engineer | Assigned | In Progress | Completed | SLA Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR A. Rane | 3 | 2 | 11 | On track | |
SN S. Naik | 4 | 3 | 9 | 1 SLA risk | |
PT P. Tiwari | 2 | 1 | 14 | On track | |
KJ K. Joshi | 5 | 4 | 8 | Near capacity |
The engineer's entire day happens on the phone: see assigned calls, run the checklist on site, capture photo/video evidence, save a draft mid-inspection, and submit — all described in Section 6.5.
Every quality finding becomes a tracked NCR with root cause, corrective and preventive action, and a verification step before closure — not a note in someone's inspection diary.
| NCR | Vendor | Severity | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCR-0143 | Shreeji Engg | Major | Root Cause |
| NCR-0138 | Anand Fab. | Minor | Corrective Action |
| NCR-0121 | Bharat H.T. | Minor | Verification |
| NCR-0114 | Shreeji Engg | Major | QA Approval |
Vendor evaluation moves from a gut call to a structured scorecard across five categories, producing an objective rating that feeds Section 6.10's dashboards and Section 11's AI trend analysis.
Trend flagged by AI Enablement Framework (Section 11) — quality score declining over 2 consecutive cycles.
Observations, findings and evidence captured in the field are auto-composed into a standardized report — no manual copy-paste from photos into Word.
Casting dimensions within tolerance (±0.05mm). Minor surface porosity noted on non-critical edge; logged as observation, not a defect.
Once tickets, NCRs and assessments flow through the platform, management gets trend lines instead of quarterly guesswork.
| Vendor | Inspections | NCRs Raised | NCR Closure Rate | Assessment Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision Cast Components | 28 | 2 | 100% | 4.6 |
| Anand Fabricators | 31 | 5 | 90% | 4.3 |
| Shreeji Engineering Works | 24 | 9 | 78% | 3.4 |
| Bharat Heat Treaters | 19 | 3 | 100% | 3.9 |